<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: On the Cover of the Rolling Stone</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ethnography.com/2008/04/on-the-cover-of-the-rolling-stone/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ethnography.com/2008/04/on-the-cover-of-the-rolling-stone/</link>
	<description>A group blog on a wide variety of topics realted to anthropology</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 23:06:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Tony Waters</title>
		<link>http://www.ethnography.com/2008/04/on-the-cover-of-the-rolling-stone/comment-page-1/#comment-276</link>
		<dc:creator>Tony Waters</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Apr 2008 15:03:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ethnography.com/?p=201#comment-276</guid>
		<description>P.S.  The comment that Zenia Helbig submitted to ASA, and is cited here, is a good one. http://blog.wired.com/defense/files/aaa_helbig_hts.pdf It discusses both the need for social science methodology in the military, and the limitations of the military in dealing with civilian academics.  There is a long way to go, but I guess you need to start somewhere.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>P.S.  The comment that Zenia Helbig submitted to ASA, and is cited here, is a good one. <a href="http://blog.wired.com/defense/files/aaa_helbig_hts.pdf" rel="nofollow">http://blog.wired.com/defense/files/aaa_helbig_hts.pdf</a> It discusses both the need for social science methodology in the military, and the limitations of the military in dealing with civilian academics.  There is a long way to go, but I guess you need to start somewhere.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tony Waters</title>
		<link>http://www.ethnography.com/2008/04/on-the-cover-of-the-rolling-stone/comment-page-1/#comment-275</link>
		<dc:creator>Tony Waters</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Apr 2008 14:59:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ethnography.com/?p=201#comment-275</guid>
		<description>I was somewhat befuddled by the photo in Newsweek of an anthropologist wearing a military uniform (including helmet). This may be an excellent method to try to understand the culture of the military itself through participant observation.  Indeed, after World War II, there were a number of good psychological and anthropological studies done of soldiers by soldiers.

       But it seems like a pretty weak way to try to deal with the Iraqi civilian population (or any civilian population).  Civilians inherently do not trust guys with military uniforms, especially when they carry a gun.  My general approach to police and military roadblocks has always been to warn my kids not to say anything, and then respond only to the questions asked in as brief a fashion as possible. (This is particularly the case when shared language skills are weak). In other words, just the opposite of what an anthropologist seeking field data generally wants.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was somewhat befuddled by the photo in Newsweek of an anthropologist wearing a military uniform (including helmet). This may be an excellent method to try to understand the culture of the military itself through participant observation.  Indeed, after World War II, there were a number of good psychological and anthropological studies done of soldiers by soldiers.</p>
<p>       But it seems like a pretty weak way to try to deal with the Iraqi civilian population (or any civilian population).  Civilians inherently do not trust guys with military uniforms, especially when they carry a gun.  My general approach to police and military roadblocks has always been to warn my kids not to say anything, and then respond only to the questions asked in as brief a fashion as possible. (This is particularly the case when shared language skills are weak). In other words, just the opposite of what an anthropologist seeking field data generally wants.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tony Waters</title>
		<link>http://www.ethnography.com/2008/04/on-the-cover-of-the-rolling-stone/comment-page-1/#comment-270</link>
		<dc:creator>Tony Waters</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Apr 2008 15:33:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ethnography.com/?p=201#comment-270</guid>
		<description>C</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>C</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mark</title>
		<link>http://www.ethnography.com/2008/04/on-the-cover-of-the-rolling-stone/comment-page-1/#comment-267</link>
		<dc:creator>mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Apr 2008 03:18:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ethnography.com/?p=201#comment-267</guid>
		<description>Alas, the article is frustrating for people actually involved in the program to read. But, as I am not the official word on the program, I am going to have to keep my hands folded.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Alas, the article is frustrating for people actually involved in the program to read. But, as I am not the official word on the program, I am going to have to keep my hands folded.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
